Dag Wieers wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Frank Bures wrote:
> >
>> >> The subject says it all:
>> >>
>> >> ffmpeg-0.5-1.el5.rf.x86_64 requires  libx264.so.68()(64bit),
>> >> but
>> >> yum whatprovides libx264.so.68
>> >> returns nothing.
>> >>
>> >> The latest available library is libx264.so.60.
>> >>
>> >> Where can I get the libx264.so.68?
>> >>
>> >> Running RHEL5.3
> >
> > If I run that same command, yum tells me:
> >
> > ----
> > Warning: 3.0.x versions of yum would erronously match against filenames.
> >  You can use "*/libx264.so.68" and/or "*bin/libx264.so.68" to get that
> > behaviour
> > No Matches found
> > ----
> >
> > So I then do: yum whatprovides '*/libx264.so.68'
> >
> > ----
> > x264-0.0.0-0.4.20090708.el5.rf.x86_64 : Library for encoding and
> > decoding H264/AVC video streams
> > Matched from:
> > Filename    : /usr/lib64/libx264.so.68
> > ----
> >
> > Kind regards,

Yes, that's correct, by my version of installed x264* packages is
*0.0.0-0.15.20080613.el5* and that version does not contain the
libx264.so.68, just the libx264.so.60

I am confused with the minor version numbering as well.  The version
0.0.0-0.4 has a newer time stamp (20090708) than the supposedly higher
version 0.0.0-0.15, which has an older time stamp (20080613).

What is going on here?

BTW, I tried to uninstall my version 0.0.0-0.15 and replaced it with
0.0.0-0.4.  This version correctly installed libx264.so.68, but
ffmpeg-0.5-1.el5.rf.x86_64 still complained that the dependency is missing.

What gives?

Cheers
Frank

-- 

<[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to