On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Anne Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 05 January 2010 17:59:31 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> Conclusion: your system is fine as is, if you want digikam you need to >> keep the older exiv2. Skipping the exiv2 update is ok. It will only be a >> problem if at some point you want to install something that requires the >> newer libexiv2.so.6 . >> > Thanks for the explanation. OK - I've lived with this for quite some time, > without any obvious problems, so I'll just go on ignoring the 'skip' warnings. Sorry for coming in so late. I did have the same problem on a machine that is running digikam. My solution was to place a line: exclude=exiv2 in /etc/yum.conf as a temporary measure. Another possible way to get around this (and if you do not mind running an older version of digikam) would be to install the one from the kbs [testing] repo. But I have not checked this one lately... Akemi _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
