Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 20.05.2010, 19:44 -0400 schrieb Alfred von Campe:
On May 20, 2010, at 17:28, Paul Heinlein wrote:
Are you running an x86_64 system? Does "rpm -q subversion" return
two (seemingly identical) entries?
No, I'm running i386 and only have one RPM installed:
$ rpm -q --qf '%{name}-%{version}.%{release}.%{arch}\n' subversion
subversion-1.6.11.0.1.el5.rf.i386
I think the issue is that CentOS itself comes with subversion V1.4.2
but I have superseded that with subversion V1.6.9 (actually just
updated to 1.6.11 today) from rpmforge. But the apache modules may
be expecting the version of SVN that came with the base OS. That's
my theory anyway.
Alfred
And that is right. If you want to use anything from base linked against
subversion you have to use the subversion package from base.
This is perfect example why one normally should to replace packages from
base. (protectbase or priorities yum plugin)
well, if you want the newer subversion from rpmforge, I guess you should
also install mod_dav_svn 1.6.11 from rpmforge?
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
