> David Hrbáč wrote: > > Dag, > > Would you be so kind and reconfigure lists not to send Reply-To? It's > > quite annoying when replying. > > Thanks, > > DH > > Hmm, as other people answered, it's not configured to send a Reply-To. > > And just to add my personal thought (even if i know that most don't > share it), I'd *prefer* having a Reply-To: on the RPMforge lists, > like it is configured on many other lists, .. (for example the > CentOS-* ones ): we have to think about all people using the lists, > and for sure i've seen people answering only to the original poster > and some posts later including a part of the missed thread back to > the list in CC: .. I can understand people just hitting the 'reply' > button of their $MUA and you can't think all the time about "yeah,
For RPMforge I typically press "Reply to all" on my MUA, so I can get a reply to the list, for others a "Reply" is sufficient as it replies to the list. I have previously made the mistake on RPMforge by clicking "Reply" and emailing the original sender. I personally think a "Reply-To" to the list is the best way to go. Just my 1 cent. Regards, Michael. > i'm on the RPMforge list, i have to cc the list itself" or "yeah, > i'm on a CentOS list, i don't have to care, it will automatically > be done ....". I still think that 99% of the cases cover a "i want > to reply to the list" and only 1% "i want to send a personal message > to the sender" > > -- > Fabian Arrotin > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users ------- End of Original Message ------- _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
