Hi, > these two messages are NOT supported by strongSwan
Yes, our AKA implementation is not complete. It does not support Identity exchange, pseudonyms or Re-Authentication. > AKA-Identity There was no need for AKA-Identity so far, as most setups use a separate EAP-Identity exchange or directly use the identity of the IKEv2 exchange. > AKA-[Re]Authentication Yes, we don't support it. The IKEv2 exchange is usually more expensive than full AKA authentication, reducing the benefit of fast Re-Authentication to a minimum. > Are there plans to implement support for this anytime soon ? There is no real interest from our side to extend the EAP-AKA support, as it is not a feature an ordinary user needs. So if no one steps up to sponsor the development, we probably won't implement these features soon. Regards Martin _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.strongswan.org https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
