Thanks Tobias, We will include those changes.

If we change the reserved fields to to zero for the same given test-case it
works fine.
Would it then be a parse issue?

Regards,
Rashmi Narasimhan


|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Tobias Brunner <[email protected]>                                       
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Richard Knight/Austin/i...@ibmus                                             
                                                                      |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc:        |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Martin Willi <[email protected]>, Rashmi Narasimhan/Austin/i...@ibmus, 
[email protected]                                              |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |06/29/2010 11:56 AM                                                          
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Re: [strongSwan] non-zero reserved fields in IKE_AUTH response.              
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|





Hi Richard,

from the log it looks like the ID is parsed incorrectly (you could increase
the
loglevel to see the details):

09[AUD] authentication of '2001:db8:f:1::1f5c57111eaff84b7' with pre-shared
key
failed

The reason for this could be an alignment issue in the parser that has been
fixed in [1] (4.3.1 was the first release to contain that fix).  Since you
are
running 4.1.10 on an embedded platform, there might well be other alignment
issues that have since been fixed, so please be aware.

Regards,
Tobias

[1] http://git.strongswan.org/?p=strongswan.git;a=commitdiff;h=42748858

--
======================================================================
Tobias Brunner                                   [email protected]
strongSwan - The Linux VPN Solution!         http://www.strongswan.org
======================================================================

<<inline: graycol.gif>>

<<inline: ecblank.gif>>

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to