Hi, I have 2 instances of strongswan running. I re-named all the executables and scripts and expected no interference between them. I have ran these concurrently for a long time. Recently I found that shutting down one instance actually terminates the tunnel of the other. Upon further investigation I think when starter exits it deletes all the SAs, even ones that are not created by itself. After I removed the SA deletion code from one, the other tunnel remains up.
I wonder if this is a good workaround. Is there any resources leaked if starter does not delete SAs when exiting? Will it reuse those same SAs when it comes back up? Or each time it exits more and more resources are leaked? Thanks, Terry _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
