> Something I just realized: it's passing "sha1" to the kernel, not > "hmac(sha1)", like I saw in previous logs that have been posted:
This is fine. "sha1" is the compatibility name used by older kernels for "hmac(sha1)". See net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.c. > I'm going to recompile the missing modules, and see if that changes > anything after installing them Probably not, they are usually not required for installing plain SAs. In the end you probably have to check what raises ENOENT in the XFRM subsystem to find out what effectively is going on. Regards Martin _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
