Hello Martin,

I am currently using 'esp=aes128gcm16' based encryption and seeing improvement in throughput. The authentication is based on x.509 certificates and the server CPU has 'aes' flag enabled.

I am following this link below as a reference on performance measurement done by Intel.

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/intelligent-systems/wireless-infrastructure/aes-ipsec-performance-linux-paper.html

Where 2Gbps could be achieved with single core using AES-NI-GCM crypto driver.

Can you please give me a bit of guideline on to get this much throughput, if I would need to take any further configuration option/trick into account.

Your response would be highly appreciated.

Thanks,
Shahreen

Shahreen Noor Ahmed
Network Support Department
Adax Europe Ltd
url: www.adax.com
e-mail: [email protected]
Direct line: +44(0)118 952 2804

On 09/07/2014 16:47, Shahreen Ahmed wrote:
Hi Martin,

In my setup I used AES-128 encryption with pre-shared key based authentication.

On the following hashed mark point, can you please give me a bit more detail about how should we make the following into effect i,e enabling AES-NI or AES-GCM? Should we do it using ipsec.conf config files or we need something else?

##
AES-NI is quite powerful and should allow you to increase your
throughput. However, running AES in GCM mode is preferable, as using a
traditional HMAC integrity function could become the bottleneck
otherwise.

##

Thanks,
Shahreen

Shahreen Noor Ahmed
Network Support Department
Adax Europe Ltd
url: www.adax.com
e-mail: [email protected]
Direct line: +44(0)118 952 2804

On 02/07/2014 10:56, Martin Willi wrote:
Hi,

By stressing with traffic it seems I can achieve maximum 43% line rate
for larger Pkt size (1400b) and only 28% line rate for smaller packet
size (256b).

Looking at the top output it seems that only 1 core is occupied and
reaches to 100% of consumption.
This is what to expect, and has been discussed a few times, for example
at [1].

Regards
Martin

[1]https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg07386.html


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to