Hi Noel,

Thanks for the help. These are the log messages:
http://pastebin.com/QjsA0XW2 <http://pastebin.com/QjsA0XW2>


> On Jun 25, 2015, at 1:45 AM, Noel Kuntze <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> Hello Glen,
> 
> No, they are not. There are different key exchanges and algorithm 
> negotiations for IKE and the subsequent SA pairs.
> You need to configure a file logger[1] and look at the logs to figure out 
> what algos are negotiated for the IPsec SAs.
> 
> Use those options for the file logger:
>                        default = 3
>                        mgr = 1
>                        ike = 1
>                        net = 1
>                        enc = 0
>                        cfg = 2
>                        asn = 1
>                        job = 1                
>                        knl = 1
> 
> [1] https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/LoggerConfiguration
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards,
> Noel Kuntze
> 
> GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658
> Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658
> 
> Am 24.06.2015 um 19:42 schrieb Glen Huang:
>> Thank you. How do i check what algorithms are negotiated? Are those the "IKE 
>> proposal" from ipsec statusall?
>> 
>> If so, they are "3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1536", which ones 
>> do you think are missing from the lsmod list?
>> 
>>> On Jun 25, 2015, at 1:36 AM, Noel Kuntze <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>> Hello Glen,
>> 
>> You obviously also need kernel support for the algorithms
>> that are negotiated for the IPsec SAs.
>> Check what algorithms are negotitated and then load the corresponding
>> kernel module.
>> 
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards,
>> Noel Kuntze
>> 
>> GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658
>> Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658
>> 
>> Am 24.06.2015 um 19:30 schrieb Glen Huang:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm trying to establish a ikev1 transport SA, but it failed with error 
>>>>> like "received netlink error: Function not implemented (89)", I guess it 
>>>>> might be that some algo module or kernel module is missing?
>>>>> 
>>>>> ipsec.conf
>>>>> http://pastebin.com/WsBDWvCC
>>>>> 
>>>>> messages from ipsec up
>>>>> http://pastebin.com/iDxisnVt
>>>>> 
>>>>> ipsec statusall
>>>>> http://pastebin.com/CH6bQGYL
>>>>> 
>>>>> output of lsmod
>>>>> http://pastebin.com/7NJD0Mxa
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have googled as hard as I can't, but didn't find any thing useful. I 
>>>>> tried kernel-libipsec, but unfortunately it doesn't support transport 
>>>>> mode. So I'm at my wits end. Could some one help me identify the missing 
>>>>> part?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
> 
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJViuzOAAoJEDg5KY9j7GZYpgcP/1DMKUt952SyFsSMOksR9CQJ
> NUX0ieuBV/yVjW7N++28p7wlcCts1Mm143zAI3mjR2/YT2YujvjvItS1P1fHUyJ/
> EtthBFqcqSvPAlGwJClCBqHvRfHP7k7NXi7GLF6pMTxtY3hPKBKQAn8m4wqaY+NU
> G4OFoT0l/cCLbdQsrf87jJ01Xp74dkpncl3hexhTnyfFjJOysrvxC7BYYmYOYmu9
> AiZW3YS9byXYDLTfwfo/H//m/GeCpQcQHp0uAXkGEVB77i9GIlFvAj0lGPb9/cuN
> mcqHn9AFXiKr71jAVWOYX3eCN2WqbJOO1y9JJq9WD+syx3dGyKlVa/w6c+xE8tTm
> w62fLUE0sXGdtRK4FOT+q4PtH2QuY5IP16l+Y93LQl9+f8nz6Pe3Rmn4X29h4maD
> C9DIxc9Gecw/b9g/kxTyjCf41UxuLpRg0CZ1JYsVhaEEYgk7LcKlrAT9fc2QWhTK
> Kp5tIOzeHkiQ9sWdyTIsLS8yJlHUXKmwXUQ3nfLRi1IJPkc+Sggs6nlebR+vW7zE
> DrlUMMQnye69v+MAxMBHzHDDzH1PNGtbXbojwbtoPXDjnG2FGB7sPqJ2IY9qFf2J
> fx2FRqocNPls20VQHWs9sQTOAweg9ptxKj1P7X5WZEYE7PC0FdKf3oZcqISfk5xw
> o617eyUW0S3MVhW6I8TJ
> =1Hvn
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to