Hi Ravi, could you guide my to an RFC or Internet draft describing this dynamic update of traffic selectors? Or are you referring to the IKEv2 Mobility and Multihoming Protocol (RFC 4555 MOBIKE) which strongSwan has enabled by default:
https://www.strongswan.org/testing/testresults/ikev2/mobike/ Regards Andreas On 01.06.2016 17:02, Ravi Kanth Vanapalli wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to know if Strongswan supports routing rule modification
through means of IKE Informational requests after the IKE tunnel has
been setup.
eg scenario is
i) UE completed IKE_SA_INIT exchange with gateway.
ii) UE completed IKE_AUTH exchange with gateway.
iii) IKE tunnel is setup with some traffic selector range TSi and TSr
iv) UE wants to modify the TSi and TSr.
v) UE sends IKE Informational exchange with updated TSi and TSr to gateway..
Does Strongswan support sending the line (v) listed above ?
In other words is routing rule modification via IKE informational
exchange supported in Strongswan ?
--
Regards,
RaviKanth
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
-- ====================================================================== Andreas Steffen [email protected] strongSwan - the Open Source VPN Solution! www.strongswan.org Institute for Internet Technologies and Applications University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil CH-8640 Rapperswil (Switzerland) ===========================================================[ITA-HSR]==
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
