Hi,

I have just masked the IP-adresses for security reasons, and nexthop just means 
that my gateway is using multipath routing (load balancing)

I have disabled table 220, Strongswans now puts it's routes in the main routing 
table and in this table is also the multipath default routes. That's why I 
don't understand why the traffic defaults out on the incoming IPsec interface, 
when this interface has a lower priority. The Linux kernel is handling the 
routing correct for local network devices, using the highest prioritized route, 
but not for IPsec clients.


>----Ursprungligt meddelande----
>Från : [email protected]
>Datum : 30/01/2017 - 00:26 (V)
>Till : [email protected], [email protected]
>Ämne : Re: [strongSwan] IPSEC remote access routing
>
>On 29.01.2017 22:23, Dusan Ilic wrote:
>> The following is my Strongswan servers routing table (default routes).
>> 
>>         nexthop via 90.225.x.x  dev vlan845 weight 1
>>         nexthop via 10.248.x.x  dev ppp1 weight 256
>>         nexthop via 85.24.x.x  dev vlan847 weight 1
>>         nexthop via 46.195.x.x  dev ppp0 weight 1
>
>Please don't replace IPs with the useless text "nexthop".
>If you replace them, replace them with values that make sense.
>
>> Strongswan listens on vlan847 so that's where the remote access clients are 
>> connecting, and also their internet traffic are going out that interface, 
>> despite ppp1 has the highest priority. Every LAN-client on the Strongswan 
>> network are primarily using ppp1, so the routing do work locally, but not 
>> for the VPN-clients.
>
>What's in table 220? The kernel handles the traffic, so it has to obey the 
>routing rules and -tables. Maybe disable the installation of routes in 
>strongSwan.conf, if there are routes in table 220 and you don't need the. 
>Remove parts you don't necessarily need.
>You need to take a look at your iptables and routing rules, if you use policy 
>based routing.
>
>
>-- 
>
>Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards,
>Noel Kuntze
>
>GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658
>Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to