On 03.10.2018 18:20, Tobias Brunner wrote: >> But when client connects via IPv6, StrongSwan try to add very strange >> route (and fails): >> >> installing route failed: 192.168.27.1/32 via fe80::fc00:1ff:feb1:8578 >> src %any dev vtnet0 >> >> I think, it is bug :-) > > That's just the log message. The daemon doesn't actually install the > route like that (there will not be a next hop if the address family > doesn't match). Why did it log such nonsense? Did it TRY to install it or simpy report failure without trying? :)
I understand, that such route is impossible. -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
