I see DH problem as Tobias said. look: Client:
IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_2048, IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_2048, IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_384_192/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_384/MODP_2048 StrongSwan: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024 Client wants MODP_2048 while Swan has only MODP_1024 enabled. As result, "no acceptable DIFFIE_HELLMAN_GROUP found" See ipsec.conf for "ike" setting. Especially about "modpgroup". <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Без вирусов. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 8:42 AM MOSES KARIUKI <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Team, > Please see below: > > *ipsec statusall* > Status of IKE charon daemon (strongSwan 5.6.2, Linux 4.15.0-45-generic, > x86_64): > uptime: 17 hours, since Feb 14 11:52:17 2019 > malloc: sbrk 1757184, mmap 0, used 534320, free 1222864 > worker threads: 11 of 16 idle, 5/0/0/0 working, job queue: 0/0/0/0, > scheduled: 0 > loaded plugins: charon aesni aes rc2 sha2 sha1 md4 md5 mgf1 random nonce > x509 revocation constraints pubkey pkcs1 pkcs7 pkcs8 pkcs12 pgp dnskey > sshkey pem openssl fips-prf gmp agent xcbc hmac gcm attr kernel-netlink > resolve socket-default connmark stroke updown eap-mschapv2 xauth-generic > counters > Virtual IP pools (size/online/offline): > 10.10.10.0/24: 254/0/0 > Listening IP addresses: > 102.1*9.2*9.** > Connections: > ikev2-vpn: %any...%any IKEv2, dpddelay=300s > ikev2-vpn: local: [102.1*9.2*9.**] uses public key authentication > ikev2-vpn: cert: "CN=102.1*9.2*9.**" > ikev2-vpn: remote: [fromcert] uses EAP_MSCHAPV2 authentication with > EAP identity '%any' > ikev2-vpn: child: 0.0.0.0/0 === dynamic TUNNEL, dpdaction=clear > Security Associations (0 up, 0 connecting): > none > > > *systemctl status strongswan* > ● strongswan.service - strongSwan IPsec IKEv1/IKEv2 daemon using ipsec.conf > Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/strongswan.service; enabled; vendor > preset: enabled) > Active: active (running) since Thu 2019-02-14 11:52:17 UTC; 17h ago > Main PID: 2204 (starter) > Tasks: 18 (limit: 2275) > CGroup: /system.slice/strongswan.service > ├─2204 /usr/lib/ipsec/starter --daemon charon --nofork > └─2232 /usr/lib/ipsec/charon --debug-ike 1 --debug-knl 1 > --debug-cfg 2 > > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon[2232]: > 09[CFG] received proposals: > IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_2048, IKE:AES_C > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon[2232]: > 09[CFG] configured proposals: > IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, IKE:AES > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon[2232]: > 09[IKE] remote host is behind NAT > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon[2232]: > 09[IKE] received proposals inacceptable > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon[2232]: > 09[ENC] generating IKE_SA_INIT response 0 [ N(NO_PROP) ] > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon[2232]: > 09[NET] sending packet: from 102.1*9.2*9.**[500] to 154.153.1*0.***[500] > (36 bytes) > Feb 15 05:31:32 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon[2232]: > 10[CFG] proposing traffic selectors for us: > Feb 15 05:31:32 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon[2232]: > 10[CFG] 0.0.0.0/0 > Feb 15 05:31:32 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon[2232]: > 10[CFG] proposing traffic selectors for other: > Feb 15 05:31:32 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon[2232]: > 10[CFG] dynamic > > The error log: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[NET] > received packet: from 154.153.1*0.***[500] to 102.1*9.2*9.**[500] (632 > bytes) > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[ENC] > parsed IKE_SA_INIT request 0 [ SA KE No N(FRAG_SUP) N(NATD_S_IP) > N(NATD_D_IP) V V V V ] > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 00[DMN] Starting IKE charon daemon (strongSwan 5.6.2, Linux > 4.15.0-45-generic, x86_64) > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 00[CFG] loading ca certificates from '/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts' > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 00[CFG] loaded ca certificate "CN=VPN root CA" from > '/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts/ca-cert.pem' > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 00[CFG] loading aa certificates from '/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts' > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 00[CFG] loading ocsp signer certificates from '/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts' > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 00[CFG] loading attribute certificates from '/etc/ipsec.d/acerts' > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 00[CFG] loading crls from '/etc/ipsec.d/crls' > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 00[CFG] loading secrets from '/etc/ipsec.secrets' > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 00[CFG] loaded RSA private key from '/etc/ipsec.d/private/server-key.pem' > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 00[CFG] loaded EAP secret for remoteprivate > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 00[LIB] loaded plugins: charon aesni aes rc2 sha2 sha1 md4 md5 mgf1 random > nonce x509 revocation constraints pubkey pkcs1 pkcs7 pkcs8 pkcs12 pgp > dnskey sshkey pem openssl fips-prf gmp agent xcbc hmac gcm attr > kernel-netlink resolve socket-default connmark stroke updown eap-mschapv2 > xauth-generic counters > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 00[LIB] dropped capabilities, running as uid 0, gid 0 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 00[JOB] spawning 16 worker threads > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] received stroke: add connection 'ikev2-vpn' > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] conn ikev2-vpn > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] left=%any > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] leftsubnet=0.0.0.0/0 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] leftid=102.1*9.2*9.** > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] leftcert=server-cert.pem > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] right=%any > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] rightsourceip=10.10.10.0/24 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] rightdns=8.8.8.8,8.8.4.4 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] rightauth=eap-mschapv2 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] rightid=%fromcert > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] eap_identity=%identity > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024,aes128-sha1-modp1024,3des-sha1-modp1024! > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] esp=aes256-sha256,aes256-sha1,3des-sha1! > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] dpddelay=300 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] dpdtimeout=150 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] dpdaction=1 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] sha256_96=no > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] mediation=no > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] keyexchange=ikev2 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] adding virtual IP address pool 10.10.10.0/24 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] loaded certificate "CN=102.1*9.2*9.**" from 'server-cert.pem' > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 05[CFG] added configuration 'ikev2-vpn' > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 08[NET] received packet: from 216.218.206.86[8310] to 102.1*9.2*9.**[500] > (64 bytes) > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 08[ENC] parsed ID_PROT request 0 [ SA ] > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > looking for an ike config for 102.1*9.2*9.**...154.153.1*0.*** > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 08[CFG] looking for an ike config for 102.1*9.2*9.**...216.218.206.86 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 08[IKE] no IKE config found for 102.1*9.2*9.**...216.218.206.86, sending > NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 08[ENC] generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 2332246493 [ N(NO_PROP) ] > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 08[NET] sending packet: from 102.1*9.2*9.**[500] to 216.218.206.86[8310] > (40 bytes) > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[NET] received packet: from 154.153.1*0.***[500] to 102.1*9.2*9.**[500] > (632 bytes) > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[ENC] parsed IKE_SA_INIT request 0 [ SA KE No N(FRAG_SUP) N(NATD_S_IP) > N(NATD_D_IP) V V V V ] > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] looking for an ike config for 102.1*9.2*9.**...154.153.1*0.*** > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] candidate: %any...%any, prio 28 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] found matching ike config: %any...%any with prio 28 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[IKE] received MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY v9 vendor ID > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[IKE] received MS-Negotiation Discovery Capable vendor ID > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[IKE] received Vid-Initial-Contact vendor ID > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[ENC] received unknown vendor ID: > 01:52:8b:bb:c0:06:96:12:18:49:ab:9a:1c:5b:2a:51:00:00:00:02 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[IKE] 154.153.1*0.*** is initiating an IKE_SA > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] no acceptable DIFFIE_HELLMAN_GROUP found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] no acceptable PSEUDO_RANDOM_FUNCTION found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] no acceptable PSEUDO_RANDOM_FUNCTION found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] received proposals: > IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_2048, > IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_2048, > IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_384_192/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_384/MODP_2048 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > candidate: %any...%any, prio 28 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a ipsec[2204]: > 09[CFG] configured proposals: > IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, > IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, > IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > found matching ike config: %any...%any with prio 28 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[IKE] > received MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY v9 vendor ID > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[IKE] > received MS-Negotiation Discovery Capable vendor ID > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[IKE] > received Vid-Initial-Contact vendor ID > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[ENC] > received unknown vendor ID: > 01:52:8b:bb:c0:06:96:12:18:49:ab:9a:1c:5b:2a:51:00:00:00:02 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[IKE] > 154.153.1*0.*** is initiating an IKE_SA > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > no acceptable DIFFIE_HELLMAN_GROUP found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > no acceptable PSEUDO_RANDOM_FUNCTION found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > no acceptable PSEUDO_RANDOM_FUNCTION found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > selecting proposal: > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > received proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_2048, > IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_2048, > IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_384_192/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_384/MODP_2048 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, > IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, > IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > received proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_2048, > IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_2048, > IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_384_192/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_384/MODP_2048 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[CFG] > configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, > IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, > IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024 > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[IKE] > remote host is behind NAT > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[IKE] > received proposals inacceptable > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[ENC] > generating IKE_SA_INIT response 0 [ N(NO_PROP) ] > Feb 15 05:11:49 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a charon: 09[NET] > sending packet: from 102.1*9.2*9.**[500] to 154.153.1*0.***[500] (36 bytes) > Feb 15 05:11:50 VM-e2b7eaee-4c52-4455-8364-c1977c8afa6a kernel: > [68232.190082] [UFW BLOCK] IN=ens3 OUT= > MAC=06:97:9c:00:00:8f:00:1d:b5:c0:a7:c0:08:00 SRC=154.153.1*0.*** > DST=102.1*9.2*9.** LEN=52 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x20 TTL=116 ID=15775 DF PROTO=TCP > SPT=54821 DPT=443 WINDOW=17520 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 > .... > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 5:37 PM MOSES KARIUKI <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Tobias for the feedback. Let me try from another machine and >> revert back to you. >> >> Thanks a lot, >> Moses K >> >> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 5:30 PM Tobias Brunner <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Moses, >>> >>> > But now it gives the error that it didn't >>> > connect as the remote host did not resolve . :( >>> >>> That doesn't sound like it's in any way related to your previous issue. >>> And until you fix that (DNS, firewall or whatever else the problem is) >>> the config updates or the log won't help as the client won't send any >>> packets to the server. >>> >>> Also, log level 9 makes no sense as 4 is the maximum and is too much >>> either. Set it to 2 (even 1 would be enough to debug the proposal >>> issue, though). >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tobias >>> >> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Без вирусов. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
