I think it takes all of them and tries them in order or something, I'd need to 
look at the code.

Am 07.11.19 um 00:11 schrieb Modster, Anthony:
> Hello Noel
> 
> If the URLs are not set, ? will strongswan read them from the User Cert
> swanctl: authorities.<name>.ocsp_uris “comma-separated list of OCSP URL’s”
> 
> ? would it be the same for CPD
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel Kuntze <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2019 2:52 PM
> To: Modster, Anthony <[email protected]>; 
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [strongSwan] OCSP update dime
> 
> Check the man page for swanctl.conf on the system running strongSwan. Search 
> for authorities or scroll to the bottom of the page.
> The possibility to configure CRL and OCSP URIs was added in 5.3.3.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Noel
> 
> Am 06.11.19 um 23:16 schrieb Modster, Anthony:
>> ? were are the configuration parameters for OCSP
>> Note: we are using swanctl (VICI)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Noel Kuntze <[email protected]> 
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2019 2:13 PM
>> To: Modster, Anthony <[email protected]>; 
>> [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [strongSwan] OCSP update dime
>>
>> Answers and question as follows:
>>
>> Q: (A.M.) ? are the methods of fetch: CPD and x509 CRL directory
>> A: CRL in ipsec.d/crls or fetched dynamically using configured (in 
>> ipsec.conf ca section or swanctl authority section) CRL URIs or CRL URI 
>> encoded in CA certificate
>>
>> Q: (A.M.) ? can OCSP revoke a cert, even if there is a valid loaded CRL
>> A: Yes.
>>
>> Am 06.11.19 um 22:46 schrieb Modster, Anthony:
>>> Thanks
>>> See below (A.M.)
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Noel Kuntze <[email protected]> 
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2019 1:35 PM
>>> To: Modster, Anthony <[email protected]>; 
>>> [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [strongSwan] OCSP update dime
>>>
>>> Hello Anthony,
>>>
>>> The exact paragraph is
>>>> the strongSwan IKE daemon will not try to fetch a fresh CRL before the 
>>>> nextUpdate time in the CRL has passed. If you want to revoke IPsec 
>>>> endpoints more quickly then you > must either dramatically reduce the 
>>>> lifetime of a CRL e.g. down to an hour or use the Online Certificate 
>>>> Status Protocol (OCSP) which will give you realtime information > on the 
>>>> certificate status.
>>>
>>> The paragraph gives you the following information:
>>> 1) strongSwan will only fetch a new CRL when the nextUpdate time has passed 
>>> (does not pertain OCSP)
>>> (A.M.) ? are the methods of fetch: CPD and x509 CRL directory
>>>
>>> 2) If you need to get new information about revocations sooner than the 
>>> nextUpdate time, then either decrease the nextUpdate time in the next CRL 
>>> file you issue or use OCSP (Online Certificate Status Protocol) instead. 
>>> OCSP works via a HTTP request asking the OCSP responder if a given 
>>> certificate (identified by its hash) is valid at the current time or not.
>>>
>>> (A.M.) ? can OCSP revoke a cert, even if there is a valid loaded CRL
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>>
>>> Noel
>>>
>>> Am 06.11.19 um 22:31 schrieb Modster, Anthony:
>>>> Hello
>>>> ? then what is Andreas referencing, below is the issue reported
>>>> https://wiki.strongswan.org/issues/568 
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>> the strongSwan IKE daemon will not try to fetch a fresh CRL before the 
>>>> nextUpdate time in the CRL has passed. If you want to revoke IPsec 
>>>> endpoints more quickly then you must either dramatically reduce the 
>>>> lifetime of a CRL e.g. down to an hour or use the Online Certificate 
>>>> Status Protocol (OCSP) which will give you realtime information on the 
>>>> certificate status.
>>>>
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Noel Kuntze <[email protected]> 
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2019 1:27 PM
>>>> To: Modster, Anthony <[email protected]>; 
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [strongSwan] OCSP update dime
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> The request doesn't really make sense.
>>>> There's no OCSP nextUpdate time, that's part of a CRL.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards
>>>>
>>>> Noel
>>>>
>>>> Am 06.11.19 um 00:03 schrieb Modster, Anthony:
>>>>> Hello
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> ? what is the nextUpdate time
>>>>>
>>>>> ? is it configurable
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wiki.strongswan.org/issues/568
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to