Thanks for your response Noel. I cannot go to swanctl so have to continue
ipsec.conf for now.
I changed the config to single subnet:
conn m1
type=tunnel
authby=secret
auto=ignore
keyexchange=ikev1
ike=aes128-sha-modp1536!
aggressive=no
ikelifetime=1500s
esp=aes128-sha-modp1536!
lifetime=1500s
right=91.0.0.3
rightid=91.0.0.3
rightsubnet=10.10.9.0/24
left=91.0.0.2
leftid=91.0.0.2
leftsubnet=192.168.9.0/24
leftfirewall=yes
Only one subnet. Still the same. Tunnel is up traffic does not go thru unless I
add the route. Do I need any iptables configuration to get it to work?
Kind rgds,
Makarand Pradhan
Senior Software Engineer.
iS5 Communications Inc.
5895 Ambler Dr,
Mississauga, Ontario
L4W 5B7
Main Line: +1-844-520-0588 Ext. 129
Direct Line: +1-289-724-2296
Cell: +1-226-501-5666
Fax:+1-289-401-5206
Email: makarandprad...@is5com.com
Website: www.iS5Com.com
Confidentiality Notice:
This message is intended only for the named recipients. This message may
contain information that is confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. Any dissemination or copying of this message by anyone other
than a named recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not a named recipient
or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to a named
recipient, please notify us immediately, and permanently destroy this message
and any copies you may have. Warning: Email may not be secure unless properly
encrypted.
-----Original Message-----
From: Noel Kuntze <noel.kuntze+strongswan-users-ml@thermi.consulting>
Sent: March 20, 2020 11:15 AM
To: Makarand Pradhan <makarandprad...@is5com.com>; users@lists.strongswan.org
Subject: Re: [strongSwan] ikeV1 tunnel established but packets are not routed.
V2 works.
IKEv1 does not support several subnets per side.
You need to enumerate all desired combinations in seperate conns. Or just use
swanctl, because ipsec is deprecated. Then the configuration is more obvious.
Am 20.03.20 um 16:11 schrieb Makarand Pradhan:
> Hi All,
>
> The solution, I mentioned earlier is wrong. If I specify the routes
> explicitly, then the packets go through even with the tunnel down.
>
> If the tunnel is up, the packets are encrypted. That is good.
>
> So, this issue is still unresolved. Pl do comment. Any advice would be highly
> appreciated.
>
> Kind rgds,
> Makarand Pradhan
> Senior Software Engineer.
> iS5 Communications Inc.
> 5895 Ambler Dr,
> Mississauga, Ontario
> L4W 5B7
> Main Line: +1-844-520-0588 Ext. 129
> Direct Line: +1-289-724-2296
> Cell: +1-226-501-5666
> Fax:+1-289-401-5206
> Email: makarandprad...@is5com.com
> Website: www.iS5Com.com
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice:
> This message is intended only for the named recipients. This message may
> contain information that is confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. Any dissemination or copying of this message by anyone other
> than a named recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not a named
> recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
> a named recipient, please notify us immediately, and permanently destroy this
> message and any copies you may have. Warning: Email may not be secure unless
> properly encrypted.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Users <users-boun...@lists.strongswan.org> On Behalf Of Makarand
> Pradhan
> Sent: March 19, 2020 4:07 PM
> To: users@lists.strongswan.org
> Subject: Re: [strongSwan] ikeV1 tunnel established but packets are not
> routed. V2 works.
>
> Hi All,
>
> The wiki gave me a hint. The issue was route. For v1 the remote protected
> network route has to be explicitly added:
>
> For me:
> ip ro add 10.10.9.0/24 via 91.0.0.3
> ip ro add 192.168.9.0/24 via 91.0.0.2
>
> Thanks all for looking at the issue.
>
> Kind rgds,
> Makarand Pradhan
> Senior Software Engineer.
> iS5 Communications Inc.
> 5895 Ambler Dr,
> Mississauga, Ontario
> L4W 5B7
> Main Line: +1-844-520-0588 Ext. 129
> Direct Line: +1-289-724-2296
> Cell: +1-226-501-5666
> Fax:+1-289-401-5206
> Email: makarandprad...@is5com.com
> Website: www.iS5Com.com
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice:
> This message is intended only for the named recipients. This message may
> contain information that is confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. Any dissemination or copying of this message by anyone other
> than a named recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not a named
> recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
> a named recipient, please notify us immediately, and permanently destroy this
> message and any copies you may have. Warning: Email may not be secure unless
> properly encrypted.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Users <users-boun...@lists.strongswan.org> On Behalf Of Makarand
> Pradhan
> Sent: March 19, 2020 2:28 PM
> To: users@lists.strongswan.org
> Subject: [strongSwan] ikeV1 tunnel established but packets are not routed. V2
> works.
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm having a unique issue. Tunnel is up but packets are not routed when
> version is ikev1. When I set the version to ikev2, then packets enter the
> tunnel as expected.
>
> Config is as follows:
>
> Running StrongSwan 5.8.2.
>
> PC - Router1 - Router2 - Tunnel - Router3 - Router4 - PC
>
> Ipsec.conf:
> conn m1
> type=tunnel
> authby=secret
> auto=add
> keyexchange=ikev1
> ike=aes-sha-modp2048!
> aggressive=no
> ikelifetime=1500s
> esp=aes-sha-modp2048!
> lifetime=1500s
> right=91.0.0.2
> rightid=91.0.0.2
> rightsubnet=192.168.9.0/24,192.168.51.0/24
> left=91.0.0.3
> leftid=91.0.0.3
> leftsubnet=10.10.9.0/24,192.168.61.0/24
>
> Tunnel is established:
> sh-4.3# ipsec statusall m1
> Status of IKE charon daemon (strongSwan 5.8.2, Linux 4.1.35-rt41, ppc64):
> uptime: 31 minutes, since May 21 23:18:31 2018
> malloc: sbrk 2297856, mmap 0, used 270112, free 2027744
> worker threads: 11 of 16 idle, 5/0/0/0 working, job queue: 0/0/0/0,
> scheduled: 2
> loaded plugins: charon aes des rc2 sha2 sha1 md5 mgf1 random nonce x509
> revocation constraints pubkey pkcs1 pkcs7 pkcs8 pkcs12 pgp dnskey sshkey pem
> fips-prf gmp curve25519 xcbc cmac hmac drbg attr kernel-netlink resolve
> socket-default stroke vici updown xauth-generic counters Listening IP
> addresses:
> 10.10.5.11
> 192.168.61.2
> 192.168.62.2
> 91.0.0.3
> 92.0.0.3
> Connections:
> m1: 91.0.0.3...91.0.0.2 IKEv1
> m1: local: [91.0.0.3] uses pre-shared key authentication
> m1: remote: [91.0.0.2] uses pre-shared key authentication
> m1: child: 10.10.9.0/24 192.168.61.0/24 === 192.168.9.0/24
> 192.168.51.0/24 TUNNEL
> Security Associations (1 up, 0 connecting):
> m1[6]: ESTABLISHED 13 minutes ago,
> 91.0.0.3[91.0.0.3]...91.0.0.2[91.0.0.2]
> m1[6]: IKEv1 SPIs: fc7af259dcba362f_i b5a3f338c097adc2_r*,
> pre-shared key reauthentication in 45 seconds
> m1[6]: IKE proposal:
> AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_2048
> m1{5}: REKEYED, TUNNEL, reqid 4, expires in 6 minutes
> m1{5}: 10.10.9.0/24 === 192.168.9.0/24
> m1{6}: REKEYED, TUNNEL, reqid 4, expires in 13 minutes
> m1{6}: 10.10.9.0/24 === 192.168.9.0/24
> m1{7}: INSTALLED, TUNNEL, reqid 4, ESP SPIs: ce0f32d4_i c769cd78_o
> m1{7}: AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_2048, 0 bytes_i, 0 bytes_o,
> rekeying in 3 minutes
> m1{7}: 10.10.9.0/24 === 192.168.9.0/24
>
> I see packets coming into router2:
> 23:50:15.205527 IP 10.10.9.3 > 192.168.9.3: ICMP echo request, id 1153, seq
> 1516, length 64 But don't see them routed into the tunnel.
>
> sh-4.3# ip xfrm policy
> src 10.10.9.0/24 dst 192.168.9.0/24
> dir out priority 375423 ptype main
> tmpl src 91.0.0.3 dst 91.0.0.2
> proto esp spi 0xc769cd78 reqid 4 mode tunnel src
> 192.168.9.0/24 dst 10.10.9.0/24
> dir fwd priority 375423 ptype main
> tmpl src 91.0.0.2 dst 91.0.0.3
> proto esp reqid 4 mode tunnel src 192.168.9.0/24 dst
> 10.10.9.0/24
> dir in priority 375423 ptype main
> tmpl src 91.0.0.2 dst 91.0.0.3
> proto esp reqid 4 mode tunnel src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0
> socket in priority 0 ptype main src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0
> socket out priority 0 ptype main src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0
> socket in priority 0 ptype main src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0
> socket out priority 0 ptype main src ::/0 dst ::/0
> socket in priority 0 ptype main src ::/0 dst ::/0
> socket out priority 0 ptype main src ::/0 dst ::/0
> socket in priority 0 ptype main src ::/0 dst ::/0
> socket out priority 0 ptype main
>
> From the wiki noticed a NAT command:
> iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -m policy --pol ipsec --dir out -j
> ACCEPT
>
> This is not making any difference.
>
> Any pointers to resolve the issue would be highly appreciated.
>
>
> Kind rgds,
> Makarand Pradhan
> Senior Software Engineer.
> iS5 Communications Inc.
> 5895 Ambler Dr,
> Mississauga, Ontario
> L4W 5B7
> Main Line: +1-844-520-0588 Ext. 129
> Direct Line: +1-289-724-2296
> Cell: +1-226-501-5666
> Fax:+1-289-401-5206
> Email: makarandprad...@is5com.com
> Website: www.iS5Com.com
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice:
> This message is intended only for the named recipients. This message may
> contain information that is confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. Any dissemination or copying of this message by anyone other
> than a named recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not a named
> recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
> a named recipient, please notify us immediately, and permanently destroy this
> message and any copies you may have. Warning: Email may not be secure unless
> properly encrypted.
>
