My request to upload saxon with all notices files added to the orignal saxon.jar is rejected by maven-upload's gatekeeper.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2652 should I go ahead to rename the group as org.codehaus.mojo? since dita-maven-plugin uses it exclusively? Thoughts? -Dan On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Dan Tran <[email protected]> wrote: > First sorry for the noise, > > > I have create a maven-upload bundle at > http://people.apache.org/~dantran/maven-upload > > The license files are under main saxon.jar/META-INF/notices > > any one interested, please review. > > The pom in bundle tell you how i create the bundle > > Thanks > > -Dan > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Of course it is. Don't pay any attention to that drama queen over there. >> >> You can either strip down his jar to just saxon proper with a POM with >> dependencies for the other stuff or you can add the licenses to the jar. >> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Dan Tran <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Jason, so it is legal for us to inject all required license files into >>> all jars under this bundle >>> >>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/saxon/files/Saxon-B/9.1.0.7/saxonb9-1-0-7j.zip/download >>> >>> order to upload them into central? >>> >>> I am really interested on how to get those files for dita-ot's 1.5 >>> dependencies >>> >>> -D >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > On 2009-10-20, at 5:16 AM, Svante Schubert wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> I am a Maven fan and stumbled over a this: >>> >> >>> >> >>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=B4EA6C26949B4127960EE2A00780F643%40Sealion&forum_name=saxon-help >>> >> >>> >> Is this true? In any case, thought you might want to know... >>> >> >>> > >>> > That post is FUD as far as I'm concerned. The problem is easily solved by >>> > including any necessary license files or notices by including them in the >>> > JAR. Then amazingly when the user gets the JAR they get the required >>> > additions. There is inventional called a JAR file. It's pretty useful for >>> > packaging things up and delivering them. >>> > >>> > The guy who posted this also appears to be from the company responsible >>> for >>> > producing Saxon, so unless they plan on suing people who use JARs coming >>> > from Maven then there is no legal problem. They have to enforce it. Would >>> be >>> > easy enough to take the JARs they produce and put the notice files in the >>> > JARs if their build is deficient in doing this. >>> > >>> > Maven is completely able to deliver copyright notices. You package them >>> up >>> > in the releases you create which is what we do at Apache. >>> > >>> >> Keep up the good work! >>> >> Svante >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > Jason >>> > >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------- >>> > Jason van Zyl >>> > Founder, Apache Maven >>> > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------- >>> > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
