>-----Original Message----- >From: Kathryn Huxtable [mailto:kath...@kathrynhuxtable.org] > >Eric, you're not going to win this one. It's part of the philosophy of >Maven. It's also good practice. > >Give it up. > >I'm not going to fight the site generation being split out of Maven. I >think I understand Jason's point on that, though I disagree. And that's a >*much* less nasty violation of Maven's perceived function, if in fact, it >is a violation. > >What you're wanting is a violation.
You're missing the point of what I'm asking. I'm not suggesting that maven make it possible or easy to *create* the violation. I'm suggesting that it should be able to *detect* the violation. I'm baffled as to why the maven community is so against the idea of having additional (optional) checks to detect problems. eric --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
