On 06/08/2010 2:48 PM, C. Benson Manica wrote:
No, it's not a pom, its purpose is to go download other dependencies and
repackage them nicely.
So it does produce an artifact. What kind of Artifact?
What exactly are you trying to do. Give enough detail so that someone
can help you.
BTW. It still could be a POM. It might use a plug-in to make something
but I would just be guessing, wouldn't I.
If you want to get help, you actually have to disclose some facts.
If it is a secret, you need to hire a consultant and have him sign a
non-disclosure after checking his references. not post to a public forum.
Ron
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Anders Hammar<[email protected]> wrote:
A pom project?
/Anders
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 16:22, C. Benson Manica<[email protected]> wrote:
Is it possible to configure a Maven project so that it doesn't build or
deploy the main artifact? I have projects that are essentially shells to
download and package dependencies, but there are no Java sources to
compile
or package as a jar (or anything else). Am I condemned to have empty
jars
deployed along with the artifacts I want, or are there configuration
options
that can address this?
--
C. Benson Manica
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
