Because the code to support that was a giant rats nest, and everything
was re-written. It's mostly an anti-pattern to use so the developers
rewriting that code didn't re-implement it. So far no one has stepped
up to provide a patch to put it back in. That's essentially it in a
nutshell.

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Adam Krieg <[email protected]> wrote:
> We have a local repo manager and it still takes a fixed amount of time per 
> artifact.  It would take a few minutes to totally rebuild a local repo as we 
> have a fair number (hundreds) of artifacts, and Maven itself requires a bunch 
> of plugins just to get started.  Granted I could just delete my group from 
> the local repo tree to speed things up, but I don't understand why we need to 
> do this when the SNAPSHOT notion seemed to work just fine for us.  The 
> SNAPSHOT version was useful and I'm not sure why it was taken out in M3.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Fox [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:42 AM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Problem with uniqueVersion=false in 3.0 beta1
>
> No, but with a repo manager, it's pretty quick to wipe the local and
> refetch everything cleanly from the local network.
>
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Adam Krieg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Is the local repository smart enough to clear out the old snapshots?  I'm 
>> worried about tons of irrelevant artifacts.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 4:00 PM
>> To: Maven Users List
>> Subject: Re: Problem with uniqueVersion=false in 3.0 beta1
>>
>> You recall correctly, uniqueSnapshots will always be true for M3
>> irrespective of what you try to set it to
>>
>> -Stephen
>>
>> P.S. I don't understand exactly why... I think it has something to do with
>> Repository managers being sufficiently good that they can reclaim the disk
>> space for you so the non-unique is no longer required.
>>
>> On 15 July 2010 20:28, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> IIRC Maven 3 only supports unique versioned snapshots (currently). There
>>> was
>>> some discussion easlier here on the mailing list regarding that. Search
>>> some
>>> archive for more info.
>>>
>>> /Anders
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 21:24, Adam Krieg <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'm trying to configure Maven to not create unique snapshots.
>>> >
>>> > When using the following settings in Maven 2.2.1, this works:
>>> >
>>> >        <snapshotRepository>
>>> >            <uniqueVersion>false</uniqueVersion>
>>> > ....
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > However when I run with Maven 3.0 beta 1, I get autogenerated numbers
>>> > appended, as if uniqueVersion was true.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Is anyone else seeing this behavior?
>>> >
>>> > Disclaimer: http://pragmatrading.com/disclaimer.html
>>> >
>>>
>>
>> Disclaimer: http://pragmatrading.com/disclaimer.html
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
> Disclaimer: http://pragmatrading.com/disclaimer.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to