The main problem isn't about allowing overlapping packages, but a way for the reports to show grouped by module.
On 26 November 2010 22:18, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > There are good reasons for not having overlapping packages in separate jars. > Namely when alves security manager is running, our if the jar is signed then > they are treated as separate packages > > - Stephen > > --- > Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes are a direct result > of using swype to type on the screen > > On 26 Nov 2010 17:31, "Jesse Farinacci" <jie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Greetings Emerson, > > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:30 AM, emerson <echofloripa.y...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I believe it is cor... > That does appear to be the case, but I would be remiss if I didn't > point out the somewhat contradictory requests you're making. You want > the aggregation to maintain the separation. :-) > > To address your previous observation about Hudson splitting out by > package, I suppose that may be true but I have structured my projects > in such a way (and I suspect most users have) where this is not an > issue. More specifically, for every project I can remember, there have > been no Java-package/Maven-module path name conflicts. > > You could open an enhancement request at the plugin's JIRA instance[0] > but I would expect this enhancement to be fairly unpopular (not > negatively popular, but disinterested) given the aforementioned > opposing philosophical goals. > > -Jesse > > [0] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE > > > -- > There are 10 types of people in this world, those > that can read binary and those that can not. > ... > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-he... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
