TestNG skips rather than fails remaining tests once the first one fails. Tynamo's tests use testng, poke around in the svn and you'll see they are otherwise very similar to JUnit(4).
Kalle On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Nathan Wilhelmi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi - HtmlUnit is a simpler solution for what we are trying to test right > now. What I am really after is failing fast on the integration tests. If the > app didn't start I would rather not run through each test and all setup > associated with each one. > > -Nate > > Kalle Korhonen wrote: >> >> Why not >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/TYNAMO/2010/07/30/Full+web+integration+testing+in+a+single+JVM >> and something like >> >> http://svn.codehaus.org/tynamo/trunk/tapestry-model/tapestry-model-test/src/main/java/org/tynamo/test/AbstractContainerTest.java >> ? >> >> With an embedded Jetty, your integration tests would behave just like >> your unit tests. >> >> Kalle >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Nathan Wilhelmi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi - >>> >>> We are working on integrating Jetty deployment into our integration >>> tests. >>> We don't have any selenium type tests yet. Is there any to fail the build >>> if >>> the web application fails to start in Jetty? We would like to use this as >>> first step. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
