On Mar 4, 2011, at 2:40 AM, Anders Hammar wrote: > "Easier" in that post isn't referring to easier to code as in fewer lines of > code, but rather making it possible to embed in an extensible way. > Maven 2.x was a command line tool, where Maven 3.0 has a modular design so > that it can be embedded in tools like m2eclipse, for example. This was > simply just not possible (in a good way) with Maven 2.x. As I understand it, > maven-embedder stopped at 2.0.4 for Maven 2 because they ran into too many > issues trying to get it to work with the old Maven 2 code base. >
Correct. > /Anders > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 06:13, mraible <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This seems somewhat complicated - isn't there an easier way? Of the top 10 >> reasons to use Maven, #4 is it's easier to embed. >> >> http://www.sonatype.com/people/2011/02/top-ten-reasons-to-move-to-maven-3/ >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Upgrading-maven-embedder-from-2-0-4-to-3-0-2-tp3379984p3408943.html >> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl --------------------------------------------------------- A man enjoys his work when he understands the whole and when he is responsible for the quality of the whole -- Christopher Alexander, A Pattern Language
