Thank you Baptiste and Gordon! I'll work something up for a comparison in jars and go from there.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Baptiste Mathus Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 4:01 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Maven versions in compilation Well, as Maven delegates some important parts like compilation to plugins or even external tools like javac, any risk of being different is quite low. And put differently, as what you ask is actually controlled by the maven-ear-plugin, maven-jar-plugin, etc. and not by maven core (granted you locked plugin versions as one should do, sure), the risk is very low that there's anything different (without upgrading one of those plugin which may new behaviour and/or bug. We migrated from m2 to m3 some time ago a quite big numbers of projects (I'd say more 30+ if talking about multimodule build, and even tens or hundreds if you speak of projects/modules), and we didn't encounter importantly noticeable differences. Cheers Le 1 oct. 2013 21:31, "John Dix" <[email protected]> a écrit : > I have a question in order to make our dev managers warm and fuzzy. > > My understanding is that a pom that compiles under 2.1.0 and 3.0.5 > produces the same jars. I know this to be true so long as either > version of Maven is pulling down the correct versions of SDK's used to > build the java files but I need some kind of "official" stamp on that to ease > nervousness. > > Thanks! > > John "Caolan" Dix > Programming Sr. SME, Digital Commerce > Amdocs Digital Services Division > o: 206-288-0334 m: 425.351.7340 > > AMDOCS | EMBRACE CHALLENGE EXPERIENCE SUCCESS > > Did you know...? > Amdocs Mobile Payments enables operators to manage any number of app > stores, merchants and aggregators and generate revenues from digital > content and mobile commerce > > Follow Amdocs on Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/amdocsinc/>, > Twitter< http://twitter.com/AmdocsInc>, LinkedIn< > http://www.linkedin.com/company/amdocs>, YouTube< > http://www.youtube.com/amdocsinc> and Google+< > https://plus.google.com/105657940751678445194> - and read the latest > on the Amdocs blog network<http://blogs.amdocs.com/>. > > > > This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and > confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may > review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp > This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp
