> -----Original Message----- > From: Barrie Treloar [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 4:48 PM > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: Is it possible to deliberately have two dependencies with the > same groupid, artifactid, and packaging, but different version? > > On 14 January 2014 10:54, KARR, DAVID <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have a situation where it would be convenient for my pom to have two > dependencies that are almost identical, only being different by the version. > The makeup of the artifact is such that it would be safe (and intended) to > use both of them. The Java package used in each is similar, but different. > The package will vary along with the version number. > > > > Will dependency resolution and the EAR plugin (and any other mechanism that > lists dependencies) have any trouble with this? > > Can you describe why you think this would be convenient? > Have you looked at classifiers? > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8040964/how-to-use-or-abuse-artifact- > classifiers-in-maven
A new version of this artifact is produced perhaps once a month. Perhaps 2-3 versions of this artifact will be referenced in the client code base at one time. More versions than that are supported in the server code base, throughout all environments. The only difference in the reported name of this artifact from one version to the next is the version number. Again, I didn't want to debate whether this is "convenient", I just wanted to know if Maven dependency resolution and things like the EAR plugin will have any trouble incorporating multiple dependencies with the same G:A, but different version. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
