Hi,

the Apache Maven team has decided to introduce a new subject prefix for the maven-dev mailinglist[1]. Messages prefixed with [Jigsaw] will be used to share information about Mavens progress on adopting JDK9 Jigsaw.

Current status: I've been able to package the current codebase of Maven (core), package all our maven-plugins and run all their integration tests successfully with the following changes:

- Use at least jdk9-b83 due to a classloading issue reported by us and solved together with Stuart McCulloch. - When using org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-component-metadata, use 1.7-SNAPSHOT

This looks very promising, though there's still a small chance we've missed a specific jigsaw change which wasn't covered by an integration-test.

Next step is to be able to compile with module-info.
There's a jigsaw-ea branch of the plexus-compiler[4] which you can fork and test. The specs of -modulepath doesn't allow a direct reference to jars yet (we've reported JDK-8144665[5]) so the jars are still copied to a separate folder. I've started adding module-info files to a local fork of the Maven project, but I'm blocked by JDK-8144879[6]

We have good contact with Oracle. Buildtools like Maven are very important to adopt these changes. The concepts are there, and there's still room for discussion on the details (like [5]). With the jigsaw-ea releases and the mentioned adjustments on your project configuration you can start testing and share your feedback.

thanks,
Robert

ps. Also check the maven-jdeps-plugin[6]

[1] http://maven.apache.org/mail-lists.html
[2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2015-September/004590.html
[3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/rev/948a1770620e
[4] https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-compiler/tree/jigsaw-ea
[5] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144665
[6] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144879

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to