If you try to call the start goal twice in the pre-integration-test phase, the second one fails with the IllegalStateException "ShutdownMonitor already started." It must be run-forked in order to start properly. Thanks, Scott
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Hammant [mailto:p...@hammant.org] Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2018 9:00 AM To: Maven Users List <users@maven.apache.org> Subject: [SUSPICIOUS] Re: [SUSPICIOUS] Re: Running integration tests twice against different webapp configurations You're explicitly calling stop() on both Jetty instances ... (pass or fail) and not just letting it fall through to the Shutdown hook which is static ? On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 1:31 AM Ellis, Scott <selli...@harris.com.invalid> wrote: > Thank you Thomas! The parallel solution worked or me. And thanks for > the other replies too. > > For the record, the second jetty instance must use the run-forked > goal, because the ShutdownMonitor thread in jetty is declared static. > A design flaw in my opinion. Trying to run a second jetty instance in > the same vm fails with error "ShutdownMonitor already started," even > with a different key and port. > > Thanks, > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Broyer [mailto:t.bro...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 2:34 AM > To: Maven Users List <users@maven.apache.org> > Subject: [SUSPICIOUS] Re: Running integration tests twice against > different webapp configurations > > Alternatively, if possible, you could possibly run the app with both > configurations in parallel (two executions of jetty-maven-plugin in > pre-integration-test and post-integration-test phase, using different > ports), and run you tests twice, for each app / port (two executions > of failsafe at integration-test phase) > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 8:44 AM Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote: > > > I'd say you need two modules; one for each IT setup. Each module is > > a Maven project and will then run the integration tests. The actual > > integration test code could then be in a third module and you > > declare a dependency on that artifact. > > > > /Anders > > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:21 PM Ellis, Scott > > <selli...@harris.com.invalid > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have a project that builds a webapp and runs integration tests > > > against it using the failsafe plugin and the jetty-maven-plugin. > > > > > > That is, I use the jetty-maven-plugin to start jetty in the > > > pre-integration-test phase, run the tests, then shut jetty down in > > > the post-integration-test phase. > > > > > > Now, my web app can have an entirely different configuration in > > > addition to the existing one, so I need to start jetty with a new > > > config and run a new suite of tests, while maintaining all the > existing functionality. > > > > > > So what I really want to do it run these phases twice: > > > > > > pre-integration-test > > > integration-test > > > post-integration-test > > > > > > First I want to run them with the my webapp configured the old > > > way, and then run the same phases again with my webapp configured > > > the new > way. > > > > > > Any advice on how to do this? The configurations can be set with > > > system properties. The problem is how to run those phases twice in > that order. > > > > > > Thanks for any insight you can offer, Scott > > > > > >
