--- Micah Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, thanks for the quick reply, and a thousand > apologies for the > duplicate post (more email addresses than I know > what to do with.) > I appreciate that not forking is a somewhat fringe > use case. The > problem that we are facing is that as a Spring based > project, we face a > non-negligible initial startup cost (loading our > Application Context), > which, in a non-forked environment, we can avoid > repeating for each > test. When forking, the time to run all our tests > balloons dramatically > (hours, not minutes). Can you provide any insight > as to how we might > alleviate this burden (Test Suites seem a possible > option, but we worry > about maintenance overhead)? Thanks very much, >
do you realy need to mount full application context for your unit tests? Normally I do not need this ( with pico/nano ) - I can come away even without a container at all ( during tests ) regards, ===== ----[ Konstantin Pribluda ( ko5tik ) ]---------------- ... Sucht gerade nach neuen Projekt oder Festanstelung.... Plugins for xdoclet-2 are released. check it out at: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/xdoclet-plugins/ ----[ http://www.pribluda.de ]------------------------ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
