This all has to do with JUnit, nothing maven specific.
If you want to write a TestSuite that runs all of the tests you specify, you
can use a solution like
http://junit.sourceforge.net/doc/faq/faq.htm#organize_3. I'm almost positive
that maven will not pick up a test class unless the name of the class ends in
"Test". However, you can specify that maven runs only the TestSuite like
"maven -Dtestcase=AllTests test:single".
Here's an example of having a TestSetup run only once for all unittests using a
different method.
// This is not a test class
public class DbSetup extends TestSetup {
private static Connection _conn;
public DbSetup(Test suite) { super(suite); }
public void setUp() throws Exception {
if (_conn == null) { // will only start database once for all tests
Class.forName("org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver");
_conn = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:hsqldb:.", "sa", "");
// LOAD SCHEMA HERE
}
}
public void tearDown() {
// do nothing, db will shut down when JVM exists or _conn is closed
}
public Connection getConnection() { return _conn; }
}
// This is a test class
public class JDBCTest extends TestCase {
�private static DbSetup _db;
�public static Test suite() {
� �TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(JDBCTest.class);
_db = new DbSetup(suite);
� �return _db;
�}
�public void testSomething() {
Connection conn = _db.getConnection();
�}
}
If you go with that solution
-jake
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 04:01 pm, Charles N. Harvey III wrote:
> This is exactly what I was looking for. I'm still playing with it
> to get it to work out correctly, but it is in the right direction, thanks.
>
> If I write a TestSuite (AllTests.java), will it run first? That's one
> thing that I was never sure of. Do the tests all run individually or
> does the Suite get executed and then it runs the tests?
>
> Just curious, I just didn't know how that part of the test framework
> of maven worked.
>
> Thanks again.
>
>
> Charlie
>
>
>
> Jake Ewerdt said the following on 1/5/2005 3:09 PM:
>
> >I set up the HSQL database in the JUnit TestSetup. This drops and
> >re-creates the database for each test class that need the database, but the
> >overhead is quite low, only a few test classes need the database running,
> >and it ensures left over database artifacts will not have any side-effects
> >on future tests. Only starting the database and creating the tables once
> >for all tests can be easily accomplished by keeping around the static
> >connection and have all test classes get that connection instead of doing
> >the setup themselves.
> >
> >The code looks something like this:
> >
> >public class JDBCTest extends TestCase {
> > private static Connection conn;
> >
> > public static Test suite() {
> > TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(JDBCTest.class);
> >
> > TestSetup wrapper = new TestSetup(suite) {
> > protected void setUp()
> > throws Exception {
> > Class.forName("org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver");
> > conn = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:hsqldb:.", "sa", "");
> > // LOAD SCHEMA HERE
> > }
> > protected void tearDown()
> > throws Exception {
> > conn.close();
> > }
> > };
> > return wrapper;
> > }
> >
> > public void testSomething() {
> > }
> >}
> >
> >I use a file-based db by replacing "jdbc:hsqldb:." with something like
> >"jdbc:hsqldb:tmpdb" only if I need to view the actual tables or data in the
> >database.
> >
> >-jake
> >
> >
> >On Wednesday 05 January 2005 11:35 am, Charles N. Harvey III wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hello.
> >>I have been doing lots of reading about how great it is to use an in-process
> >>DB like Hypersonic for testing. Thing is, there are not many examples of
> >>how to do this. What I want to do is start an in-memory DB (not a file DB
> >>because the test is small) when I run my tests, and then run tests.
> >>
> >>So the first thing that has to happen when I run "maven test" is that the
> >>DB has to be created. Then I have to execute CREATE statements for the
> >>necessary tables. Then I can proceed with my tests.
> >>
> >>Has anyone done this? Should I use a file-based DB instead of in memory?
> >>How do I get the maven test suite to "do this one thing first, and only
> >>once"?
> >>
> >>Any help is greatly appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >>Charlie
> >>
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
