It was meant for the list indeed (I still have to get used to my new gmail account ;-)
On 5/1/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure if you intended this to be on the list... I'd rather have > this discussion there. Especially since you are replying to someone > else's mail :) I get this problem with fellow gmail users all the time > - you need to use reply to all. > > On 5/2/05, Thomas Van de Velde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But I am not dropping support for the applications that are working just > > fine on WS4. > > That's fine. Maven 1.0.2, I presume, is working fine on WAS4 too... so > you are welcome to continue using it. > > > Spring is supported from 1.3 up to 1.5 > > Spring is a framework, not an application. That's a big difference. > > > My point is, a minor release should not introduce major modifications. > > This is not so much a major modification - we're not breaking any > scripts or builds, just dropping support for a platform that we don't > have the bandwidth to maintain and test. > > Sorry if this has struck a nerve, but please understand where I am > coming from here. I am trying to keep Maven moving for the majority of > the community. As I said, I'm willing to take assistance to keep it > 1.3 compatible. > > Cheers, > Brett >
