Thanks for that.  Before I add an issue there regarding nanocontainer
dependency scopes, can anyone explain where ${picocontainer.version}
is evaluated from here?:

http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/nanocontainer/nanocontainer/1.0-beta-4/nanocontainer-1.0-beta-4.pom

It seems to be resolved as the nanocontainer pom version, which is
obviously not as intended.

Cheers,

Mark

On 5/6/05, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please lets have a look to this link
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV
> 
> Vincent
> 
> 2005/5/6, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I was wondering who's responsible for the m2 pom's in the maven2
> > repository?  There's an error in a commons-jxpath dependency:
> >
> > http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/commons-jxpath/commons-jxpath/1.2/commons-jxpath-1.2.pom
> >
> > <dependency>
> >      <groupId>ant-optional</groupId>
> >      <artifactId>ant-optional</artifactId>
> >      <version>1.5.1</version>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > Should be:
> >
> > <dependency>
> >      <groupId>ant</groupId>
> >      <artifactId>ant-optional</artifactId>
> >      <version>1.5.1</version>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > But there's no pom.xml or v4 project.xml in the commons-jxpath source
> > repository - is this created manually?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to