Check
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1087

On 5/20/05, David Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After I sent this I found this on the mail archive from 23 November 1994
> (http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg14797.html):
> 
> "search the archives for more information (typically it refers to tlds).
> Fixed in 1.1. The JIRA roadmap for 1.1 will have it listed. (1.0.1 does
> not contain the fix, it is not backwards compatible)."
> 
> Is this still the case?
> 
> ..David..
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Jackman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 10:15 AM
> To: Maven Users List; Brett Porter
> Subject: RE: Dependencies with the same artifactId/groupId but a
> different type
> 
> This doesn't work.  It still ignores the second dependency that has the
> same groupId and artifactId as a previous one.  Changing the artifactId
> will get it noticed, so my workaround was to change the artifactId then
> use the <jar> element to "fix" the filename back to what it should be
> (with the original artifactId).  It's ugly but it works.
> 
> What does "known issue" in this case mean?  Is it something that is
> going to be fixed?  In M1.1 or M2 timeframe?
> 
> ..David..
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 7:53 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Dependencies with the same artifactId/groupId but a
> different type
> 
> put the first part of "type" into the version as a workaround.
> 
> - Brett
> 
> On 5/14/05, Arik Kfir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Julien Kirch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Maven Users List" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 1:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: Dependencies with the same artifactId/groupId but a
> > different type
> >
> > >> It seems that maven does not correctly handle identical
> > >> dependencies with only different types - is this true? Each of
> > >> these dependencies DOES get downloaded if I comment the other two.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It's a known issue in maven 1
> >
> > Is there a way to go around it? Perhaps even manual dependency
> > downloading in maven.xml or something of the sort?
> >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Julein
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to