Not ever having used it...does the commercial JCoverage version work well? If so, then I suggest keeping it on the page for those happily using it and add a note stating the couple of important issues/problems and point to Cobertura.
-----Original Message----- From: J�rg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 1:24 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: RE: Cobertura code coverage tool plugin? Carlos, Carlos Sanchez wrote on Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:36 PM: > Hi, > > As I've commented in the JIRA issue the plugin can be hosted in SF > http://maven-plugins.sourceforge.net/ and if everything goes ok it > could be added to the maven distribution. What's the point in keeping jcoverage plugin then? JCoverage itself has serveral problems and fixes did not get applied by the jcoverage team. That was the main reason for the cobertura fork anyway. - J�rg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
