Yes, resources are replaced, not merged. The only lists merged are
dependencies, developers and contributors.
Organization should be inherited - and I believe there are unit tests
to prove it at multiple levels. Can you provide a test case?
Thanks,
Brett
On 8/4/05, Jamie Bisotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/3/05, Jamie Bisotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Using Maven 1.0.2, I have the following layout:
> >
> > trunk
> > common
> > project.xml
> > components
> > comp1
> > project.xml
> > comp2
> > project.xml
> > framework
> > project.xml
> >
> > where common/project.xml is the "parent" POM and the other three
> > project.xml files extend it. I'm seeing several places where it
> > elements are not being inheirited. The <organization> element is one
> > example, and <resource> is another.
> >
> > The following works fine when it appears in one of the "child" POMs,
> > but as soon as I move it to the "parent" POM, the resources are no
> > longer getting copied.
> >
> > <resources>
> > <resource>
> > <directory>${basedir}/src/java</directory>
> > <includes>
> > <include>**/*.hbm.xml</include>
> > </includes>
> > <filtering>false</filtering>
> > </resource>
> > ...
> > </resources>
> >
> > Running "maven -X java:jar-resources" shows no reference to the
> > <resources> in the "parent", but it does show reference to the few
> > remaining <resources> in the "child"
> >
> > Not sure if I'm missing something or doing something wrong. Any
> > insights would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > --
> > Jamie Bisotti
> >
>
> My previous observations were slightly incorrect. It seems to depend
> on whether or not the "child" has its own <resources> section or not.
> My comp1/project.xml DOES NOT have any custom resources, so it has no
> <resources> section of its own; in this case, the "parent" <resources>
> are used appropritely. However, my framework/project.xml DOES have a
> few custom resources, so it has a <resources> section of its own, in
> addition to the one in "parent"; in this case, the "parent"
> <resources> seem to be ignored.
>
> Is this a bug, or is it something that just isn't possible? Either
> way, I think the <organization> element is still odd.
>
> --
> Jamie Bisotti
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
