Hi Wim, one year ago, I had to choose a CI tool because my company needed one for all its Java projects (about 150). After experimenting lots of them, the choice was obvious to me: Luntbuild. (but this is my own experience) Luntbuild is a very good compromise between easy-to-use and powerful-enough qualities: - its GUI is very user friendly and intuitive to use: it's really easy to learn how to use it - it allows you to define complex CI processes, with lots of different parameters and conditions So as I needed to target lots of development teams with different skill levels, this was the best choice to me. What's more, Luntbuild has very good SCM features. Luntbuild's integration with Maven is minimal, but you can manage to handle most cases thanks to properties that you can pass to the Maven command. Personnally, I use Luntbuild's SCM features instead of Maven 1's ones. Lots of our projects have been using Luntbuild for several months now, and they appreciate it a lot. As for now, IMHO, no other open-source CI tool can offer all what Luntbuild does. But I'm really looking forward to seeing Continuum offering as many functionnalities. Best Regards / Cordialement, Fabrice BELLINGARD DINQ/DSIN/INSI/EATE/IDVS/AIDV (+33) (01 61) 45 15 91 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wim Deblauwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ail.com> Pour Maven Users List 08/09/2005 13:22 <users@maven.apache.org> cc Veuillez Objet répondre à Advised Continous Integration tool? Maven Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED] che.org> Hi, I'm looking into CI tools and I wonder what other already use: CruiseControl, LuntBuild, DamageControl, maven's own Continum, ... What are your experiences with CI tools and Maven 1.x? What are the advantages/disadvantages? I heared CruiseControl is not so easy to setup compared to LuntBuild. Anyone caring to share his experience? regards, Wim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]