you can use continuum for maven1, maven2, ant and shell project
Emmanuel
emerson cargnin wrote:
for someone who is using maven1, what would be the best option?
We have also a big project using multiproject feature.
We are intending to use CC, and as someone just said continuum is more
integrated with maven2, i'm not sure if its worth to give a try.
Thanks
Emerson
On 09/09/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello again.
The Maven ClearCase plugin doesn't help in it self - in that it is mostly a
wrapper
over the Ant "cc" target-set.
They may help you to operate on, for instance, a "build number" property
file or the likes.
The CI tools needs to be able to get modification notificatios from the SCM
subsystem, in
order to schedule builds for any given component.
Currently we're using the "pull" method (for each N minutes, scan view X
for changes on
branch Y) in CruiseControl, but I'm led to believe work is underway to
support dynamic
modification events ("push") from ClearCase.
This would possibly be done with triggers, but I'm not too sure about that.
----- Reply to All the Original Message -----
Author: Wim Deblauwe
To: Maven Users List
Date: 08.09.2005 17:20:25
Subject: Re: Advised Continous Integration tool?
We are using ClearCase also, so your information is very valuable. I saw
there is a Maven plugin for CruiseControl. Doesn't that help?
regards & thank you already for everybody's replies,
Wim
2005/9/8, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'd say its much up to your environment and your other requirements.
We've got (struggling with?) ClearCase and therefore we needed a CI
tool
that sat well on top of it.
I couldn't get Luntbuild to work with dynamic views (it seemed
insistent
upon creating NEW snapshot views all the time),
continuum does not (or at least, didn't) support ClearCase and neither
did
DamageControl.
So we ended up with CruiseControl.
I'm fairly happy with it, but it's one big (underscored and capital
letters) drawback is it's configuration.
But I gather there's work going on with that problem too.
The nice thing about CruiseControl is it's flexibility - not it's
visual
impact.
I'm *not* a GUI developer, so I'm capable of appreciating the things I
do
not see ;-)
As always, the best way to determine the best solution for you - is to
try
them all :-/
// Jan-Helge Bergesen, Systems Developer, TMN Group, AXXESSIT ASA,
http://www.axxessit.no
----- Reply to All the Original Message -----
Author: Jesse McConnell
To: Maven Users List,wim.deblauwe
Date: 08.09.2005 14:36:15
Subject: Re: Advised Continous Integration tool?
I like continuum a lot...and since I am already using m2 for things
it
integrated really easily with continuum..
and continuum is really pretty neat when you dig into it, quite a
little
edumacation...
On 9/8/05, Wim Deblauwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking into CI tools and I wonder what other already use:
CruiseControl, LuntBuild, DamageControl, maven's own Continum, ...
What are your experiences with CI tools and Maven 1.x? What are the
advantages/disadvantages? I heared CruiseControl is not so easy to
setup
compared to LuntBuild. Anyone caring to share his experience?
regards,
Wim
--
jesse mcconnell
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
