I filed MNG-1048 for the first issue. On 9/30/05, Ralph Pöllath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 29.09.2005, at 16:19, John Casey wrote: > > If you specify these two dependencies directly in your own dependency > > set, and set their scope to provided, it should work. > > That's what I thought. Doesn't work for me though (I think it did > with previous versions): > > // pom.xml > <project> > <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> > <groupId>test</groupId> > <artifactId>test</artifactId> > <packaging>war</packaging> > <version>0.1</version> > > <dependencies> > <dependency> > <groupId>javax.servlet</groupId> > <artifactId>servlet-api</artifactId> > <version>2.4</version> > <scope>provided</scope> > </dependency> > > <dependency> > <groupId>springframework</groupId> > <artifactId>spring-web</artifactId> > <version>1.2.4</version> > <exclusions> > <!-- faces api not available on repo1 --> > <exclusion> > <groupId>javax.faces</groupId> > <artifactId>jsf-api</artifactId> > </exclusion> > </exclusions> > </dependency> > </dependencies> > </project> > > // create web.xml to make maven happy > $ mkdir -p src/main/webapp/WEB-INF > $ touch src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml > > $ m2 package > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---- > [INFO] Building test:test:war:0.1 > [INFO] task-segment: [package] > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---- > [INFO] [resources:resources] > [WARNING] > Artifact javax.servlet:servlet-api:jar:2.4 has scope > 'provided' replaced with 'compile' > as a dependency has given a broader scope. If this is not > intended, use -X to locate the dependency, > or force the desired scope using dependencyManagement. > ... > [INFO] [war:war] > [INFO] Copy webapp resources to test-0.1 > [INFO] Assembling webapp test in test-0.1 > [INFO] Generating war test-0.1.war > [INFO] Building war: test-0.1.war > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL > > // oops > $ ls target/test-0.1/WEB-INF/lib | grep servlet > servlet-api-2.4.jar > > > FYI, DependencyManagement information is only triggered on demand. > > That > > is, the info in the DependencyManagement section will be triggered if > > you specify a dependency directly within your POM that matches the > > groupId/artifactId of the info given in DependencyManagement. When > > this > > happens, any specification in the original dependency will dominate > > over > > the corresponding info in the DependencyManagement section. > > This means I can use a parent pom to specify default dependency info > which can be overridden by child poms. Nice. > > Thanks, > -Ralph. > > > Ralph Pöllath wrote: > > | Hi, > > | > > | I get the following warning when packaging my webapp project: > > | > > | [WARNING] > > | Artifact javax.servlet:jsp-api:jar:2.0 has scope 'provided' > > | replaced with 'compile' > > | as a dependency has given a broader scope. If this is not > > | intended, use -X to locate the dependency, > > | or force the desired scope using dependencyManagement. > > | > > | Using -X tells me the dependency on javax.servlet:jsp-api-2.0 is > > | introduced by springframework:spring-web-1.2.5, so I tried to > > exclude > > | it like this: > > | > > | <dependency> > > | <groupId>springframework</groupId> > > | <artifactId>spring-web</artifactId> > > | <version>1.2.4</version> > > | <exclusions> > > | <exclusion> > > | <groupId>javax.servlet</groupId> > > | <artifactId>jsp-api</artifactId> > > | </exclusion> > > | </exclusions> > > | </dependency> > > | > > | But unfortunately, jsp-api-2.0.jar still ends up in my war file, > > | breaking my app. > > | > > | Now I'd like to "force the desired scope using > > dependencyManagement" as > > | mentioned in the warning, but cannot find any info on how to use > > the > > | dependencyManagement section in the pom. > > | > > | I'd like to use it to tell m2 to always set the scope of > > | javax.servlet:jsp-api and javax.servlet:servlet-api to provided, > > and to > > | completely ignore some transitive dependencies like ojb and > > toplink, > > | which are introduced by springframework:spring-orm, for example. > > | > > | Is that possible? > > | > > | Cheers, > > | -Ralph. > > | > > | > > | > > | > > | > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > | To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > | For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > | > > | > > | > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) > > > > iD8DBQFDO/f4K3h2CZwO/4URAhdxAJ9B0aNQT47F1Xz6sWXpqq5ix6c5SwCfTnwf > > wtBsedkBkFQDCfc0OeBL6R0= > > =HVC6 > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
