This is what I have in my local repository:
<project>
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>jwsdp</groupId>
<artifactId>xjc</artifactId>
<version>1.6</version>
<name>JAXB XML Binding Code Generator Package</name>
<description>
Part of the Java Web Services Developer Pack
</description>
<url>http://java.sun.com/xml/jaxb/index.jsp</url>
<distributionManagement>
<snapshotRepository>
<id>agwilliams1000</id>
<url>scp://myweb.dyndns.org/Webroot/maven/
repository</url>
</snapshotRepository>
</distributionManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId>
<version>1.0.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-impl</artifactId>
<version>1.0.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-libs</artifactId>
<version>1.0.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml</groupId>
<artifactId>namespace</artifactId>
<version>1.0.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml</groupId>
<artifactId>jax-qname</artifactId>
<version>1.0.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml</groupId>
<artifactId>xsdlib</artifactId>
<version>1.0.5</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</project>
On 7 Oct 2005, at 20:49, Russell, Mark wrote:
Could you post your invented 'top level' pom?
I'm interested in seeing how others are handling this.
MAR
-----Original Message-----
From: Ashley Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 1:43 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: JWSDP & Maven 2 ?
I have used the javax.xml groups for the individual artifacts, but my
invented 'top level'
pom that includes the artifacts as dependencies is in the jwsdp
group. After all
some of those jars included in the jwsdp download aren't specific to
jwsdp.
AW
On 7 Oct 2005, at 20:28, Russell, Mark wrote:
That was similar to the route I was starting down. Specifically
all the
jars the come from the jwsdp were going to end up in a jwsdp group.
Primarily this was to ensure that everything from each jwsdp release
stays in one place, and it becomes very simple to determine where the
jars originally came from (important to me as I have to maintain the
repository myself).
Of course to do it this way means deviating from what is
documented at
http://maven.apache.org/reference/standard-sun-jar-names.html.
(Though
I feel this doc is incomplete partly because it doesn't make any
mention
of the jaxb stuff)
MAR
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 11:26 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: JWSDP & Maven 2 ?
On 07/10/05, Russell, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I knew it wouldn't/couldn't be in the central repo. Was more
looking
to
see how it was handled by someone else.
The primary reason I ask is because none of the jars actually have
any
version information on them, so is everyone else just using the
jwsdp
version or are they doing something else?
I'm using the Sun StAX impl from JWSDP in my repo as jwsdp:sjsxp:1.6,
so the version taken from the main JWSDP version.
I agree that a standard should be decided upon and documented here:
http://maven.apache.org/reference/standard-sun-jar-names.html
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
