Support for this has been committed to SVN. On 10/24/05, Allison, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A much better choice would be to allow install:install-file to > optionally create a POM for the file it is installing. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 09:43 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: Installing Commercial Jars and missing POM XML files > > > From: "Pilgrim, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > My question is, how do I tell maven not to going looking remotely > > for POM XML files for the commercial jars since I installed > > them locally on my machine? > > http://www.mail-archive.com/users%40maven.apache.org/msg26066.html > > I've just been creating a pom for them with just the > group/artifact/version > and Maven stops complaining. > > Should we submit poms for these non-distributable commercial libraries, > so > that they're in the repository like the ones for Sun .jars (and we can > come > to some agreement on the group/artifact ids?) > > -- > Wendy Smoak > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
