On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 16:23 +0000, Alex McManus wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> thanks very much for the helpful response. However, I have already been 
> looking at the quickstart guide. If I run the following sequence of 
> commands, copied directly from this guide:
> 
> mvn archetype:create -DgroupId=com.mycompany.app -DartifactId=my-app
> mvn archetype:create -DgroupId=com.mycompany.app -DartifactId=my-app 
> -DarchetypeGroupId=org.apache.maven.archetypes 
> -DarchetypeArtifactId=maven-archetype-site
> 
> ...then I still get the "please run from a clean directory" error. 
> Because this happens before it attempts to download the 
> "maven-archetype-site" artefact, it suggests to me that the artefact 
> plugin isn't checking any settings in the archetype before throwing this 
> error. When I check my repository, I am using archetype plugin 
> "maven-archetype-1.0-alpha-3".

It is alpha-4 of the site archetype which allows generation within an
existing project. 

> Should I expect this to work with the 1.0-alpha-3 archetype plugin, or 
> is this such a new feature that it hasn't made it into a release yet?

You'll get the latest archetype plugin automatically, and the latest
site archetype should be coming down as well. Is alpha-4 not coming
down? If not try specifying the version and that should work. 

> Another thing that I'm curious about - when it is doing a partial create 
> of an archetype that contains a new POM (as the site archetype does), is 
> it clever about merging the new POM with the old. For example, will it 
> merge the dependencies in the archetype POM with those already in the 
> target project?

There's no logic like that yet, but certainly something we could do.
Right now when there is an existing project the POM is left as is.

> Thanks again,
> 
> Alex.
> 
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
> 
> >On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 12:27 +0000, Alex McManus wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>I'm just getting to grips with Maven for the first time, and having some 
> >>difficulties getting archetypes to add files to an existing project. If 
> >>I understand things correctly, archetypes can also be used to add files 
> >>to an existing project, as well as to create a new one from scratch. 
> >>This is controlled via the <allowPartial> element in the archetype.xml file.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Correct.
> >
> >  
> >
> >>First question: why do none of the core archetypes support partial 
> >>behaviour? 
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >It is a new feature that was added specifically for the getting started
> >guide so that a site can be added to an existing project. I also wanted
> >to be able to build up large projects but the site archetype was the
> >first stage. Just a matter of resources and time to adjust or add new
> >archetypes that can be additive. 
> >
> >  
> >
> >>It seems to make sense that I can use the quickstart 
> >>archetype to setup my initial project, then add web capabilities with 
> >>the webapp archetype, and then add site documentation with the site 
> >>archetype. 
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Absolutely.
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Each of these archetypes creates discrete directories under 
> >>src that would seem to be able to co-exist with each other.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >There are definitely cases where you don't want an archetype to be
> >partial but the site archetype and archetypes that might be used to
> >build up a j2ee app would are good examples of useful partial
> >archetypes.
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Second question: does anyone have the allowPartial behaviour working in 
> >>an archetype (and are there any examples that I can look at)? I've tried 
> >>to setup some simple examples, but I always get the some error as above. 
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >You can use the quickstart archetype with the site archetype. The site
> >archetype is currently the only partial archetype. You can look at the
> >getting started guide where it's described:
> >
> >http://maven.apache.org/guides/getting-started/index.html
> >
> >  
> >
> >>My apologies if I'm missing something blindingly obvious, any help would 
> >>be appreciated...
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >It's just that the archetypes haven't been adjusted yet.
> >
> >  
> >
-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
jason at maven.org
http://maven.apache.org

We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.

 -- Unknown


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to