This is on the roadmap for Maven 2.1, FWIW.

- Brett

On 10/29/05, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 09:41 -0600, David Jackman wrote:
> > Is there an answer for this question anywhere?  This is something I'll
> > be facing in the not-too-distant future as well.
>
> It would be a matter of placing something in the session to indicate the
> task had been done already or the surefire plugin could drop a token
> somewhere when the tests were done and we could compare the timestamp of
> that token with the test sources. The latter is probably easier but the
> former might be a more general solution for plugin developers.
>
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Van Steenberghe Mario (GFDI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 3:30 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [m2] multiple goal executions
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > We've set up a build that generates some jar files for our projects.
> > During this build, I also generate some reports, such as surefire-report
> > and clover.
> >
> > Now, when I look in the log files, I see that certain goals are executed
> > multiple times. The one that bothers us the most is 'surefire:test'.
> >
> > After some research I found that the concerned report mojos have an
> > '@execute phase="test"' annotation, which means that this phase will be
> > executed before the mojo is executed, no matter if this phase was
> > already executed somewhere before.
> >
> > Since our junit tests take about 20 minutes to run completely, it is
> > very important that they are not run multiple times.
> >
> > Is there any way I could easily overcome this problem ?
> >
> > Many thanks in advance,
> > Mario Van Steenberghe
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> --
> jvz.
>
> Jason van Zyl
> jason at maven.org
> http://maven.apache.org
>
> First, the taking in of scattered particulars under one Idea,
> so that everyone understands what is being talked about ... Second,
> the separation of the Idea into parts, by dividing it at the joints,
> as nature directs, not breaking any limb in half as a bad carver might.
>
>   -- Plato, Phaedrus (Notes on the Synthesis of Form by C. Alexander)
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to