On 14/11/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But how does that help in the situation where you declare dependencies
> A and B, but both declare a dependency C at the same level? Is C
> first, second or third when ordered?
>
> I haven't looked at this issue, but an application should avoid
> classpath ordering at all costs.

I agree classpath ordering is not ideal, but I think an order should
be enforced so that mvn is deterministic.  The real-life scenario I
was encountering was a same-named resource being loaded from one
dependency jar rather than the intended dependency jar.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to