And it's back up: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1619
regards, Wim 2005/11/18, Wim Deblauwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hmmm... JIRA is down currently (http://jira.codehaus.org) > > > 2005/11/18, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Sure, please attach it to a JIRA issue. > > > > Thanks, > > Brett > > > > On 11/18/05, Wim Deblauwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Brett, > > > > > > Is it ok if I send you a 60 KB zip file with my setup so you can take > > a look > > > at it? It will probably make things clearer that way. > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Wim > > > > > > 2005/11/18, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > The group ID's are different - is that intentional? > > > > > > > > Are you sure that the message you were getting is only in the parent > > > > pom (as expected)? > > > > > > > > Other than that, I'm having trouble understanding what you are > > doing. > > > > Parent doesn't have to be the inverse of modules, it just generally > > is > > > > that way to be less confusing. > > > > > > > > pom.xml > > > > id = root > > > > <modules: a, b > > > > > > > > a/pom.xml > > > > <parent: root > > > > > > > > b/pom.xml > > > > <parent: root > > > > <dependency: a > > > > > > > > for example. > > > > > > > > - Brett > > > > > > > > On 11/18/05, Wim Deblauwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hmm... They both have the same parent. This parent is a pom > > package > > > > defining > > > > > all the basics for my java modules. This is the parent: > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.mycomp.build</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>build-java</artifactId> > > > > > <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> > > > > > <packaging>pom</packaging> > > > > > > > > > > And in both modules: > > > > > > > > > > <parent> > > > > > <groupId>com.barcoview.mis.build</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>build-java</artifactId> > > > > > <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> > > > > > </parent> > > > > > > > > > > How should I handle this case? I'm using the <modules/> tag, > > because I'm > > > > > developing both modules at the same time, and I would like to call > > 'mvn > > > > > package' on the "top"-module and the module this "top"-module > > depends on > > > > > also gets build. I hope you understand what I'm trying to archive. > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Wim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2005/11/18, Brett Porter < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > Do they have a parent? > > > > > > > > > > > > I was a little confused by something you said earlier that just > > > > > > clicked: you depend lang depends on logging, but you have a lang > > > > > > module in logging? Module is (sort of) the inverse of a parent > > > > > > relationship, which is different to a dependency. > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe the dependency tree is getting confused by something in > > this > > > > regard. > > > > > > > > > > > > - Brett > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/18/05, Wim Deblauwe < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I saw that other thread, but my projects have a different > > > > artifactId: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <groupId> com.mycomp.utils</groupId> > > > > > > > <artifactId>utils-lang</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.mycomp.utils</groupId> > > > > > > > <artifactId>utils-logging</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so, maybe still something else? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2005/11/18, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it was discovered on another thread that its because > > the > > > > > > > > artifactId is the same in two modules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Brett > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/18/05, Wim Deblauwe < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Both modules are defined as 'jar', so that can't be the > > problem. > > > > I > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > assume then that this is a bug? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2005/11/17, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/17/05, Wim Deblauwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > What does the error 'No goals needed for project - > > > > > > > > > > > skipping' mean? Any clue on what goes wrong? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nothing was bound to the lifecycle for your packaging. > > Check > > > > > > > > > > <packaging> is jar or something else that defines a > > compile or > > > > > > prior > > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Brett > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
