On 11/21/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IMO, there should be a POM for Spring - mainly because I believe that > there's a lot of folks just using spring.jar rather than the > individual JARs. >
that happens mainly because there was no tool supporting transitive dependencies, and you had to add several jars > > I believe that if you depend on > > > > spring-support > > spring-orm > > spring-hibernate > > spring-remoting > > spring-core > > > > you get the same things as in spring jar. > > So now I have to have 25 lines of XML in my pom.xml - instead of 5 for > spring.jar? Ugh. I mean that those are the ones you need to get all classes but the probabilities of using everything from spring are remote, give it a try, I'm sure that you don't need more than one, unless you make a big jar with things nobody will use at the same time, which is what transitive deps try to avoid. (eg. spring hibernate depending on hibernate2 and 3). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
