site fixed. On 11/24/05, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Weston, Toby wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > Silly question probably but the Maven site talks about using M1 for critical > > projects (http://maven.apache.org/maven1.html#m1-or-m2) as opposed to M2, > > specifically it mentions M2 is a beta release? Is that still the case as the > > download area seems to infer its non-beta/stable? Basically, what's the > > status of Mega-Maven-2? > > Maven 2.0 has been release. We're still working on Mega-Maven :-) > > > Cheers, > > Toby > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -- > > jvz. > > Jason van Zyl > jason at maven.org > http://maven.apache.org > > People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples. > Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without > actually developing a running system is doomed to failure. No one > is that smart. A framework is a resuable design, so you develop it by > looking at the things it is supposed to be a design of. The more examples > you look at, the more general your framework will be. > > -- Ralph Johnson & Don Roberts, Patterns for Evolving Frameworks > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
