Matt, My approach in that kind of situation is to depend directly on xalan with scope=provided, rather than doing an exclude.
Not sure if that's ideal. I have no idea what the criteria should be for a something like displaytag to declare dependencies as provided vs. compile. -Stephen On 11/23/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've noticed that when including the displaytag (v 1.0), I had to > exclude xalan if I didn't want it included in my WAR. Shouldn't xalan > be scope=provided? > > Thanks, > > Matt > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Stephen Duncan Jr www.stephenduncanjr.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
