Isn't this just because those artifacts are not in your local
repository and must be installed manually?

They were possibly installed under the other groupIds previously.

- Brett

On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything.  Using
> springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now
> neither works.
>
> required artifacts missing:
>   javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2
>   javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B
>   javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0
>   javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
>
> Is it possible to revert things back to what they were?
>
> Matt
>
> On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them 
> > soon.
> > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the
> > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
> > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
> > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
> > > rather than "springframework".
> > >
> > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
> > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
> > > warning:
> > >
> > > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > > Downloading: 
> > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central 
> > > (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > /maven2)
> > > Downloading: 
> > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> > > ng-1.2.6.pom
> > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central 
> > > (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > /maven2)
> > >
> > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> > > warnings.  It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
> > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
> > > files.
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to