Some of the libs are are used by components in the EAR.
On 12/21/05, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, this is a really tricky question. Thoses libs are for the WAR > artifact > only and are not used in any way by components in the EAR file, right? > > On 12/21/05, Karthik Manimaran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > My question here is - How to avoid jars that can be reused from being > > copied > > to the lib directory and have it as a common file in the EAR. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > Karthik. > > > > > > On 12/20/05, Srepfler Srgjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Karthik Manimaran wrote: > > > > > > >The jar file DotComCommon-1.0.jar is duplicated in the EAR file. > > > > > > > >1. It is present in the EAR file as a separate jar at the root. > > > >2. It is also present inside PrivacyWeb.war file (inside WEB-INF/lib > > > folder) > > > > > > > >The same duplication occurs for all other jars used by PrivacyWeb > > > (runtime, > > > >commons-*, ContentManager etc) > > > > > > > >Now the EAR is twice as big as what it is supposed to be. I do not > need > > > >Maven to include all the depencies required for the WAR file inside > lib > > > >directory as it is already available as separate jars in the EAR > file. > > > > > > > >Thanks and regards, > > > >Karthik. > > > > > > > For my team we allow the war module to have it's own libraries, only > if > > > the lib can be reused between it and the ejb module do we put it in > ear, > > > otherwise we keep them separated. That's our approach. > > > Cheers > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > .::You're welcome ::. > >
