"... I am not comfortable enough with them to
count on it working right every time."

That is not completely accurate.  I discovered the checkpoints after
learning (through trial and error) about the release plug-in.  I can see
in the code that they should work every time, but I did not know about
them when I started.  Not knowing about them at that time gave me the
impression of a process that we not repeatable.  Therefore, I am now in
the habit of removing the properties file when the release:prepare does
not end with a good result.

It would be nice to take a look into the checkpoints, to see how they
can help.

Thank you, Michael


   I usually perform a synch or compare before executing the
release:prepare.  I agree that a failure or user abort during that goal
is not transactional in nature.  I know that checkpoints exist in the
release.properties file, but I am not comfortable enough with them to
count on it working right every time.  I usually blow that file away and
start over.

 

On the bright side, once you can get through it, the process is nicer
than the manual alternatives.

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick O'shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 10:05 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: RE: [m2]release:prepare requires snapshots ?

 


Hi, 

Is there an issue with release:prepare when running against multiple
projects ? 
I'm running this against a parent project with two child projects. 

When release:prepare runs from the parent project it runs correctly
against the first child project 
and updates the version numbers in the poms to the new numbers. 

However because the second child project has a reference to both the
parent project (through <parent> tags) 
and a dependency on the first child project it will fail the cvs diff
that is part of the release:prepare. 
This is because during the execution of the release:prepare on the first
child, 
it modified the second childs pom.xml with the new version numbers and
didn't check second project pom.xml. 

Has anyone else managed to sucessfully perform a release:prepare under
similar conditions ?

thanks 
patrick



  



"Mike Perham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

01/04/2006 03:48 PM 

Please respond to
"Maven Users List" <users@maven.apache.org>

To

"Maven Users List" <users@maven.apache.org> 

cc

 

Subject

RE: [m2]release:prepare requires snapshots ?

 

 

 




I think the idea is that if you are releasing an entire set of projects
at once, you would want to keep their versions in sync.  If you want to
do what you say below (which is what we want to do also), you just do
finer grained releases.  You don't do recursive releases but only
release those modules which have changed.

mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Laurent Berteau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 5:06 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: [m2]release:prepare requires snapshots ?

Hi,

dan tran wrote:
> It follows maven development process where
> 
>   - during development, every one works on snapshots
> 
>   - at release time, the snapshost got changed to release version, 
> check back into SCM, label, and build.
>     This is where customer can use, including qa, stake holder, etc
> 
>   - then the version is increamented with snapshot and check into SCM
again.

This implies that in a multi-module project, every sub-module version
number is incremented even if no changes has been made.

I have a multi-module project where some modules do not evolve
frequentely whereas some do.
I do not want to overload the repository and the scm history with
different version of exactly the same code.

Is the only solution to run the release plugin against each module
independently ?

Do my way of thinking does not fit with the maven approach of the
release policy ?

Best regards,

--
Laurent Berteau


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to