Hi Jay,

Ok I did try some experiments but they failed. I will try to dig into the
catacombs of plexus

It's fine were're back to the list I Hope someone responds.

have a nice time.
Rolf


On 2/14/06, Jay H. Hartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rolf,
>
> Have you made any headway on this? I haven't seen any traffic on the Maven
> list about it. Have you tried the Plexus mailing lists?
>
> I looked at the Maven repository on ibiblio. I bet you have to specify
> plexus-compiler-eclipse-1.5 (groupId="plexus") as a dependency to get the
> eclipse compiler. The plugin does not explicitly provide a dependency on any
> particular compiler.
>
> I'm sorry I kind of dropped you back to the list. I'm leaving for 2 wks
> vacation in a few days, and have been scrambling just to get work done
> before then. My only path right now for digging out what to do, other than
> trying the Plexus list, would be to scour through the Plexus code some more.
> FYI, the subversion repository is at svn://svn.codehaus.org/plexus/scm. I
> looked at the plexus-compiler-manager and plexus-compilers projects, but
> there is some core Plexus code that actually populates the list of available
> compilers in DefaultCompilerManager, and I couldn't figure out where that
> came from. The plexus-compiler-eclipse project appears to include the
> org.eclipse.jdt-3.1.jar file in its dependencies, so once you get that
> included, I don't think you'll have to worry about setting your Eclipse
> classpath.
>
> Good luck! Please let me know what you find.
>
> Jay
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Rolf Strijdhorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 10, 2006 2:12 AM
> *To:* Jay H. Hartley
> *Subject:* Re: eclipse compiler
>
> Hi Jay I did one test and only including the compilerId eclipse is not
> enough.
> I am about to do a test with eclipse somewhere on the classpath.
> have to figure out how though.
>
> Rolf
>
> On 2/10/06, Jay H. Hartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Rolf,
> >
> > In looking through the M2 CompilerMojo, I found that it just
> > wraps Jason van Zyl's Plexus Compiler package. (
> > http://plexus.codehaus.org) That appears to support 'eclipse' as a
> > compiler variation, so I'm thinking you can just set the compilerId
> > parameter to 'eclipse' instead of the default 'javac' instead of using the
> > 'executable' parameter I suggested before.
> >
> > I'm cc-ing the mailing list on this, to see if we can get verification
> > from the plugin authors.
> >
> > Jay
> >
> >  ------------------------------
> > *From:* Rolf Strijdhorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:17 PM
> > *To:* Jay H. Hartley
> > *Subject:* Re: eclipse compiler
> >
> >  Thanx Jay
> > By the way I am using M2
> >
> > But does this mean I can just insert: org.eclipse.jdt.core.JDT Compiler
> > Adapter
> >
> > or do I need to include the complete path to the compiler or ( a lot of
> > ors) is it enough to include the jar that contains the compiler in the
> > classpath?
> >
> > Rolf
> >
> >
> > On 2/8/06, Jay H. Hartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Rolf,
> > >
> > > If you are using Maven 2, set the "executable" parameter for the
> > > compile:compile goal:
> > >
> > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/compile-mojo.html
> > >
> > > For a description of how to set compiler parameters, see
> > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/howto.html
> > >
> > > For Maven 1, set the " maven.compile.executable" property in one of
> > > the
> > > various properties files:
> > >
> > > http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/plugins/java/properties.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Hope this helps,
> > >
> > > Jay
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Rolf Strijdhorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:25 AM
> > > > To: Maven Users List
> > > > Subject: eclipse compiler
> > > >
> > > > hi I am wondering is het possible to assign a different
> > > > compiler. I want to use the eclipse compiler for my builds.
> > > > thanx
> > > > Rolf
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to